![Stefan Baumgartner @deadparrot@mastodon.social on Twitter: "Always have to remind myself that filter: drop-shadow exists. box-shadow gives you the shadow of, well, the box... drop-shadow takes transparencies into account and complements any shape Stefan Baumgartner @deadparrot@mastodon.social on Twitter: "Always have to remind myself that filter: drop-shadow exists. box-shadow gives you the shadow of, well, the box... drop-shadow takes transparencies into account and complements any shape](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBwQC3pWwAAtmSv.jpg:large)
Stefan Baumgartner @deadparrot@mastodon.social on Twitter: "Always have to remind myself that filter: drop-shadow exists. box-shadow gives you the shadow of, well, the box... drop-shadow takes transparencies into account and complements any shape
![Mohammed Sadik on Twitter: "code: filter: drop-shadow(12px 12px 7px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7)); box-shadow: 12px 12px 7px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7);" / Twitter Mohammed Sadik on Twitter: "code: filter: drop-shadow(12px 12px 7px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7)); box-shadow: 12px 12px 7px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7);" / Twitter](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCPA-OcVEAM7G7M.png)
Mohammed Sadik on Twitter: "code: filter: drop-shadow(12px 12px 7px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7)); box-shadow: 12px 12px 7px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7);" / Twitter
![filter: drop-shadow` property gets mangled in compiled CSS when using external scoped CSS · Issue #3312 · vercel/next.js · GitHub filter: drop-shadow` property gets mangled in compiled CSS when using external scoped CSS · Issue #3312 · vercel/next.js · GitHub](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3394202/33049327-275cc750-ce25-11e7-8936-153e4a5acc1b.png)